"We don’t have relevancy ratings for search engines"
An excerpt from Sullivan (2017).
Posts
Filtered by: evaluating-search-engines
Clear filter ×hallucinationsocial-search-requestPerplexity-AIcomparing-resultsgenerative-searchprompt engineeringsearch-auditsmicro interactions in searchYou.comspeculative-designGoogle-BardCGTbetter-searchcompetition-in-searchchoice-in-searchgenerative-web-searchknowledge-cutoffsalternative-search-enginesevaluating-results-metasearch-quality-complaintsstanding-queriessearch-engine-optimizationrepository-of-examplesAnthropic-ClaudeCFP-RFPRAGPhinddoubtingadvertising-in-searchseo-for-social-goodOpenAI-ChatGPTpublic-interest-technologyspeculative-classroom-exercisesTavilysearch-user-interfacesgenerative-search-APIfresh-searchautocomplete-in-web-searchfalse-premiseTikTokAndievaluating-search-enginesarticulationsocial-searchdata-poisoningInflection-AI-Piacademic-searchChainForgeautomation biasMeno-Paradox+221 more
Showing 3 posts tagged "evaluating-search-engines"
searchsmart.org
Overview of searchsmart.org's approach to testing academic search systems using metamorphic testing from the user perspective.
The Need for ChainForge-like Tools in Evaluating Generative Web Search Platforms
A provocation.