tooling to support people in making hands-on and open evaluations of search
We have a big chance to really change search for the better. Will we?
Posts
Filtered by: choice-in-search
Clear filter ×hallucinationsocial-search-requestPerplexity-AIcomparing-resultsgenerative-searchprompt engineeringsearch-auditsmicro interactions in searchYou.comspeculative-designGoogle-BardCGTbetter-searchcompetition-in-searchchoice-in-searchgenerative-web-searchknowledge-cutoffsalternative-search-enginesevaluating-results-metasearch-quality-complaintsstanding-queriessearch-engine-optimizationrepository-of-examplesAnthropic-ClaudeCFP-RFPRAGPhinddoubtingadvertising-in-searchseo-for-social-goodOpenAI-ChatGPTpublic-interest-technologyspeculative-classroom-exercisesTavilysearch-user-interfacesgenerative-search-APIfresh-searchautocomplete-in-web-searchfalse-premiseTikTokAndievaluating-search-enginesarticulationsocial-searchdata-poisoningInflection-AI-Piacademic-searchChainForgeautomation biasMeno-Paradox+221 more
Showing 5 posts tagged "choice-in-search"
"We might be returning to the early/pre-Google era of the 1990s where there were multiple search engines"
Who is going to try to make web search better?
What organizations are best situated to apply their own resources and promote developer attention and energy to this problem and opportunity?
Towards "benchmarking" democratization of good search.
A recommendation.
The Need for ChainForge-like Tools in Evaluating Generative Web Search Platforms
A provocation.